My hotel room overlooks the Vatican, right at the entrance to the Vatican Museums |
Some people say they like to travel "off the beaten path." Me, I prefer the slightly beaten path. I like a place familiar with us tourists, with a tourist infrastructure, but not one that is over-run, where you have to make reservations for museums and restaurants well in advance.
This year's spring vacation was supposed to be to such a place: Tbilisi, Georgia. But with all that is happening in the old Soviet Union, I thought it could be a place where I easily could get stranded if things went kablooey. And, given that we are still emerging from two years of COVID hysteria, I thought this is probably the perfect year to go somewhere "on the beaten path," where I've wanted to go but haven't because of massive tourist hordes.
Such as Rome. The one in Italy.
St. Peter's Square in the rain. Look at that colonnade! |
When it comes to ranking places 1 to 10 for being "on" or "off" the beaten track, with "10" being London or New York or Paris, and "1" being Yemen. Or Irian Jaya (the Indonesian half of the island of New Guinea). Or Hartford, Connecticut. (Seriously, Hartford. Does anyone know anyone who ever CHOSE to visit there?) Rome is a solid "9." And I prefer places in the 4, 5, or 6 range.
The sky looks even more ominous facing south on St. Peter's Square toward the obelisk at the center of the square. |
But there are no massive tourist hordes anywhere in 2022 (except, apparently, the Las Vegas Strip, where I am decidedly not going). Is anyplace even a "7" on the scale this year? So here I am. In Rome. Crossing off another from my "must see before they chop my feet off" list.
No comments:
Post a Comment